Learners will differentiate between public and private property. They will use public sources of information to inform their decisions on public action for the common good.
Five Forty-Five Minute Class Periods
The learner will:
- explain that "commons" areas are designated for public use as a result of local government decisions.
- analyze what responsibility citizens have for the use of "commons" areas.
- read various maps to determine land use practices in a community.
- distinguish between uses of public and private land through the use of a Venn diagram.
- use oral or written speech to persuade government officials to allow alteration of a commons area.
Learners will plant flowers in the community in "commons" areas. This is the implementation of the academic service component begun with the planting of flowers from seed in Lesson Two: Plants − What Are Their Parts and Functions? The format may be used for some other class project (besides flowers) that may involve community property.
Anticipatory Set:
Distribute local maps or project a local map on an overhead for the learners to see. Have each learner come forth and locate where they live.
- While looking at the map, ask learners if they know the difference between their private property and surrounding public property. How can it be identified? (See map keys and identifiable landmarks.) Explain that land held for use by the whole community is considered to be a "commons" area. They were designated for public use by local governments. Ask, "Why would local governments designate commons lands for use by all citizens rather than allowing the land to be sold for private housing?" Do citizens have any responsibility for the way they use commons areas?
- Have the learners list what makes property public or private. Outline characteristics of each/both on the board using a Venn diagram. See Public vs. Private Land Use Answer Key (Attachment One) for possible answers.
- While still in their groups, ask learners to brainstorm possible problems they might encounter if they were to alter public property. List the ideas. What Core Democratic Values are involved?
- Also ask, "From whom would you get permission to alter public property (plant flowers)?" Learners should use the community directory or phone book to identify those people who are the responsible civic leaders. (Possibilities include: school board, county commissioners, township supervisors, city planners, etc.)
- Have the learners send out a letter inviting speakers to come and discuss possible outcomes of altering public property in a positive way. Have the speaker address learner interests and concerns.
- Using Oral Presentation Rubric: Proposal (Attachment Two) and Persuasive Letter Rubric (Attachment Three), go over the requirements with the learners. In small groups, have the learners work cooperatively to draft a formal proposal (for the planting of flowers) and present this proposal to the governing group representing a particular site of public land. (The proposal may be in writing or in speech.)
- If the project is adopted, the project should be carried out in the community using the flowers planted in Lesson Two: Plants− What Are Their Parts and Functions? The learners will need to brainstorm the different tasks that will be necessary to carry out the beautification project and formulate the plan of implementation. Discuss what the planting of the flowers is expected to do to improve the area and environment.
- After the project, ask students to reflect about how their philanthropic act contributed to the common good, and how do they feel about being philanthropic.
The written letters or prepared persuasive speeches may be used as an assessment of learning. Learners may reflect on public and private land use for the improvement of the common good and write an addition into their journals.
Lesson Developed By:
David Grunwald
|
Category |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Stays on Topic |
Stays on topic all (100%) of the time. |
Stays on topic most (99-90%) of the time. |
Stays on topic some (89%-75%) of the time. |
It was hard to tell what the topic was. |
|
Comprehension |
Learner is able to accurately answer almost all questions posed by classmates about the topic. |
Learner is able to accurately answer most questions posed by classmates about the topic. |
Learner is able to accurately answer a few questions posed by classmates about the topic. |
Learner is unable to accurately answer questions posed by classmates about the topic. |
|
Enthusiasm |
Facial expressions and body language generate a strong interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others. |
Facial expressions and body language sometimes generate a strong interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others. |
Facial expressions and body language are used to try to generate enthusiasm, but seem somewhat faked. |
Very little use of facial expressions or body language. Did not generate much interest in topic being presented. |
|
Preparedness |
Learner is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed. |
Learner seems pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals. |
The learner is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking. |
Learner does not seem at all prepared to present. |
|
Category |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Format |
Complies with all the requirements for a friendly letter. |
Complies with almost all the requirements for a friendly letter. |
Complies with several of the requirements for a friendly letter. |
Complies with less than 75% of the requirements for a friendly letter. |
|
Grammar & spelling (conventions) |
Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling. |
Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar and/or spelling. |
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar and/or spelling |
Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar and/or spelling. |
|
Capitalization and Punctuation |
Writer makes no errors in capitalization and punctuation. |
Writer makes 1-2 errors in capitalization and punctuation. |
Writer makes 3-4 errors in capitalization and punctuation. |
Writer makes more than 4 errors in capitalization and punctuation. |
|
Content Accuracy |
The letter contains at least 5 accurate facts about the topic. |
The letter contains 3-4 accurate facts about the topic. |
The letter contains 1-2 accurate facts about the topic. |
The letter contains no accurate facts about the topic. |
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to freely use this information for nonprofit (noncommercial), educational purposes only. Copyright must be acknowledged on all copies.